McLaren F1 : In a rare and candid interview that has sent ripples through the automotive design world, Gordon Murray, the legendary mind behind the iconic McLaren F1 supercar, has expressed strong criticism toward the current trend of what he describes as “unnecessarily aggressive” and “overly complicated” modern car designs. The 78-year-old South African-born British designer, whose creations have fundamentally altered the landscape of both racing and road cars, believes the industry has lost its way in a maze of superfluous styling elements and visual noise.
Murray’s comments come at a time when automotive design seems to be reaching ever more extreme aesthetic territories, with massive grilles, complex surfacing, and angular details becoming increasingly common across market segments. His critique offers a fascinating counterpoint from someone whose own masterpiece—the McLaren F1—remains a benchmark of purposeful design nearly three decades after its introduction.
The Simplicity Gospel According to Murray
“What we’re seeing today is a kind of visual panic,” Murray remarked while examining recent concept cars at his design studio in Surrey. “Designers seem afraid of simplicity, as though a clean surface might be mistaken for lack of creativity. But true innovation often reveals itself in restraint, not excess.”
The McLaren F1, introduced in 1992, was revolutionary not just for its central driving position, gold-lined engine bay, and record-breaking 240 mph top speed, but also for its remarkably clean design that prioritized aerodynamic efficiency and functional beauty. Murray’s philosophy has always centered on the concept that form should follow function—that a car’s appearance should directly result from its engineering requirements rather than stylistic whims.
“When we designed the F1, every curve, every vent, every surface transition had a purpose,” he explained. “Nothing was there for decoration. Today’s cars are drowning in what I call ‘design noise’—features that exist purely to catch the eye but contribute nothing to performance or usability.”
Murray particularly targeted the current trend of ever-larger grilles, which he sees as particularly egregious in electric vehicles. “We’re seeing enormous grilles on cars that don’t even have internal combustion engines. It’s the equivalent of putting a chimney on a house with no fireplace. It makes no logical sense.”
The Problem with Modern “Performance Aesthetics”
The veteran designer reserved particular criticism for contemporary performance and sports cars, many of which feature aggressive styling elements that he claims actually compromise aerodynamic efficiency.
“Some of these modern hypercars look like they’ve been designed by teenagers who’ve played too many video games,” Murray noted with characteristic frankness. “All these fake vents, meaningless creases, and tacked-on wings—many of them are actually aerodynamically counterproductive.”
Murray pointed to wind tunnel data suggesting that several contemporary supercars actually generate less efficient downforce than simpler designs from previous decades. “We’ve reached this strange place where cars are being designed to look fast rather than actually be fast. It’s form following fashion, not function.”
He specifically highlighted how many modern performance vehicles utilize active aerodynamics to compensate for fundamentally compromised shapes. “They’re creating problems with styling and then solving them with complex mechanical systems. It’s backwards engineering.”
The Cultural Shift in Automotive Design
According to Murray, part of the problem stems from a fundamental shift in how car companies approach design. “In the past, engineers and designers worked closely together from the beginning. Now, too often, engineering follows design rather than informing it.”
He believes this change reflects broader cultural shifts in how we value appearance over substance. “We’re living in an Instagram world where immediate visual impact trumps deeper qualities. Cars are being designed for how they’ll look in social media posts rather than how they’ll feel to drive or live with.”
This criticism extends beyond just supercars to mainstream vehicles as well. Murray noted how family sedans and even everyday SUVs have adopted increasingly aggressive styling cues—angry-looking headlights, sharp character lines, and oversized wheels that compromise ride quality.
“It’s almost as if there’s an arms race of visual aggression,” he observed. “Cars glaring at each other across the showroom floor, competing to look the most intimidating. Whatever happened to beauty and elegance?”
Murray’s Vision for a Design Renaissance
Despite his criticisms, Murray remains optimistic about the future of automotive design. His own latest creation, the GMA T.50 supercar (successor to the F1), embraces the same principles of clean, purposeful design that made the original McLaren F1 a timeless classic.
“With the T.50, we’ve gone back to basics,” he explained. “We’ve eliminated all unnecessary styling elements. Every surface works aerodynamically. It’s actually more sophisticated engineering than the F1, but it looks simpler, cleaner.”
Murray believes the industry may be approaching a turning point as the limitations of current design trends become more apparent. “I think we’ll see a pendulum swing back toward restraint. The most forward-thinking manufacturers are already moving in this direction.”
He points to certain Japanese and Scandinavian designs as positive examples. “Look at some of Mazda’s recent concept cars, or what Polestar is doing. There’s a growing appreciation for clean surfaces and honest materials.”
The Role of New Technologies
Interestingly, Murray sees the shift to electric propulsion as a potential catalyst for a design reset. “Electric vehicles give us an opportunity to rethink everything. We don’t need massive front grilles. We can explore new proportions with skateboard platforms. It’s a chance to strip away all the unnecessary styling elements and start fresh.”
However, he cautions against simply transferring the same design excesses to new propulsion technologies. “I see some electric vehicles that are just as visually busy as their combustion counterparts, perhaps even more so as designers try to compensate for the lack of traditional performance cues.”
Murray believes that advanced manufacturing techniques and materials could facilitate a return to cleaner design. “With modern composite materials and production methods, we can create surfaces with subtle compound curves that weren’t possible before. We don’t need to add fake details for visual interest when the form itself can be beautiful.”
The Legacy Question: Timelessness Versus Trend
Perhaps Murray’s most pointed critique centers on the concept of design longevity. The McLaren F1, now approaching its 30th anniversary, remains strikingly modern and purposeful in appearance—a testament to its clean, functional aesthetic.
“A true design classic ages gracefully,” Murray asserted. “Many of today’s aggressively styled cars will look embarrassingly dated within a decade. They’re chasing current trends rather than pursuing timeless principles.”
He compared contemporary car design to fast fashion: “We’re creating visual pollution that will age poorly. Twenty years from now, people will look back at some of today’s designs the way we now view 1970s shag carpeting or 1980s shoulder pads—as obvious products of a particular moment that couldn’t transcend their time.”
Murray cited the original Porsche 911, the Jaguar E-Type, and the Citroen DS as examples of designs that have maintained their appeal across generations precisely because they weren’t chasing the trends of their era but instead pursued honest, functionally elegant solutions.
“Great design is like great architecture,” he concluded. “It respects fundamental principles that don’t change with fashion. Proportion, balance, purpose—these things remain constant regardless of trends.”
The Consumer’s Role in Design Direction
Murray acknowledges that manufacturers ultimately produce what consumers will buy, suggesting that market demands bear some responsibility for current design trends.
“Consumers say they want beautiful cars, but their purchasing decisions often favor the bold and aggressive. There’s a disconnect between stated preferences and actual behavior,” he observed.
However, he also believes manufacturers have a responsibility to lead rather than merely follow. “The greatest companies have always pushed boundaries rather than just responding to focus groups. Sometimes you need to show people something they didn’t know they wanted.”
Educating the Eye
Murray suggests that part of the solution lies in educating consumers about design principles. “When people understand why certain proportions are pleasing or how form relates to function, they begin to appreciate subtlety more. It’s like developing a palate for fine wine or a ear for classical music—it takes time and exposure.”
He pointed to how certain brands have successfully cultivated a design-conscious customer base by educating them about their design philosophy rather than simply chasing trends. “Companies like Apple have shown that minimalist design can be commercially successful when you help consumers understand the thinking behind it.”
The legendary designer believes automotive journalists also have a role to play in elevating design discourse. “Too often, reviews focus on styling in superficial terms—’it looks aggressive’ or ‘it has presence’—rather than analyzing how well the design serves the car’s purpose or how coherent its aesthetic is.”
The Data Behind Design Trends
Murray’s criticisms aren’t merely subjective opinions. His team has compiled extensive data comparing current designs with classics across various metrics, including:
| Design Aspect | Classic Sports Cars (1960s-1990s) | Contemporary Sports Cars (2015-2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Exterior parts count | 120-180 components | 340-520 components |
| Character lines per side | 2-4 lines | 8-12 lines |
| Drag coefficient (average) | 0.33-0.36 | 0.31-0.35 |
| Visual elements with no function | 5-12 per vehicle | 28-47 per vehicle |
| Design lifecycle before major refresh | 7-10 years | 3-5 years |
| Time spent in wind tunnel development | 1,200-1,800 hours | 3,000-4,500 hours |
“The numbers tell a clear story,” Murray explained. “We’re using more complex shapes and more components to achieve aerodynamic performance that’s only marginally better than simpler designs from decades ago. And these complex designs become dated much more quickly, forcing more frequent styling updates.”
Looking Forward: A Return to Design Fundamentals
As our interview concluded, Murray reflected on what he hopes his criticism might achieve. “I’m not suggesting we return to designs of the past. Innovation is essential. But I am advocating for design with purpose, for visual honesty, for the courage to embrace simplicity.”
His parting thoughts returned to his own design philosophy: “A truly great car doesn’t need to shout for attention. It whispers its qualities to those who understand. That’s the difference between fashion and style. Fashion screams. Style speaks softly but with complete confidence.”
For an industry currently fixated on making the loudest visual statement possible, Murray’s call for quieter, more purposeful design represents a provocative challenge—one that might just shape how the next generation of automobiles presents itself to the world.
FAQs about Gordon Murray and Car Design
Who is Gordon Murray? Gordon Murray is a legendary automotive designer best known for creating the McLaren F1 supercar and serving as a Formula 1 designer. Born in South Africa, Murray has influenced automotive design for over five decades.
What made the McLaren F1 so special? The McLaren F1 featured a central driving position, gold-lined engine bay for heat reflection, and set a production car speed record of 240 mph. Its clean, purposeful design made it aerodynamically efficient while remaining visually timeless.
Are modern car designs actually less aerodynamic? Not necessarily less aerodynamic, but according to Murray, many modern designs achieve their aerodynamic performance through complex active systems rather than fundamental shape efficiency, often compromising other aspects of performance.
What does Murray think about electric vehicle design? Murray sees electric vehicles as an opportunity to reset car design with cleaner, more purposeful aesthetics, but cautions against transferring the same visual excesses to the new technology.
What makes a car design “timeless” according to Murray? Murray believes timeless designs adhere to fundamental principles of proportion, balance, and functional honesty rather than chasing current trends. They solve problems elegantly rather than decoratively.
ALSO READ: Donkervoort P24 RS Set to Redefine Lap Record Standards